Green Buildings Are LEEDing the Way
By James F. Finlay, Real Estate Technology Editor
A May 2005 article at www.Buildings.com
by Robin Suttell (RSuttell@cox.net)
demonstrates the increasing momentum behind the “green” building movement. [ Full text here [ http://www.buildings.com/Articles/detailBuildings.asp?ArticleID=2475
].
LEED Acceptance Grows
Widespread use of the US Green Building Council’s
sustainability benchmark is being used to show civic responsibility in both the
private and public sector. LEED provides
a quantified standard for the efficient lighting, waste control, air and
daylight quality that have always been central to sustainable, livable design.
A LEED Users Summary compiled in February 2005 showed 41 US city and
county governments have adapted some form of the US Green Building standard for
construction and renovation of commercial buildings. Some places like San
Francisco, Portland and Seattle have had
green guidelines on the books for years.
Austin TX (site of the first USGBC annual GreenBuild conference) passed
a resolution in June 2000, joined now by Dallas and Houston. Kansas
City is a pilot program city for the new LEED-EB (Existing Building) program
covering renovations. Peter Templeton,
USGBC director of LEED and International Programs, says cities make up 25% of
registered LEED projects.
Champions of sustainable healthy building design are found
coast to coast. Boston Mayor’s Thomas M.
Marino’s Green Building Task Force, San Francisco’s Mark Palmer (Green Building
Coordinator), Issa Z. Dadoush, director of Houston’s Building Services
Department, Chicago’ Marcia Jimenez, Department of Environment commissioner are
all implementing the USGBC standard.
Chicago pushed the envelop by turning a 1952 building on a brownfield
into the LEED Platinum rated Chicago Center for Green Technology.
Cost / Benefit Analysis Confidence and Depth Improves
When sustainable, healthy design begun early, studies by
Carnegie Mellon, Katz and others have shown that construction costs are similar
to conventional construction. Energy
efficiency is important to save money and remove some operating expense risk
but the real advantage of LEED certification is in worker productivity
gains. Meta studies that combine
numerous smaller studies to gain statistical confidence and highly controlled
school student grading have now confirm good air and light can add to worker
productivity, economically dwarfing the energy component.
- According to figures from the
Federal Energy Management Program, by 2001, higher energy efficiency
building standards for federal agencies had reduced energy consumption by 23%
measured against 1985 baseline measures, at an estimated annual savings to
taxpayers of $1.4 billion.(1)
- Green buildings can reduce
annual energy costs by 20-50%, resulting in substantial savings for the
state and taxpayers. Typical payback period is 9 years with improvement
lifecycle over 20 years.(1)
- The cost of labor is the
greatest operating expense (around 89%) for commercial buildings. Studies
have shown that green buildings can increase worker productivity by 6-16
percent.(2)
- Incredible cost savings and
environmental benefits can been achieved through green building water
conservation strategies, such as on-site storm water and gray water
capture/use/resuse, technology retrofits (on toilets, faucets, etc.), and
the incorporation of native plant species that require less or no
irrigation. Studies of buildings applying for LEED certification indicate
that most were able to reduce water use by at least 50% outdoors and by at
least 30% indoors.(2)
Sources:
(1) U.S.
Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Federal Energy
Management Program. “The Business Case for Sustainable Design
in Federal Facilities.” August 2003. 26 February 2004
<http://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/bcsddoc.pdf>.
(2) Kats, Greg. “The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report
to California’s Sustainable
Building Task Force.” October 2003. Capital E. 26 February 2004
<http://www.cap-e.com/ewebeditpro/items/O59F3259.pdf>.